<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/2.4.6" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Homebrew Beer Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php</link>
		<description>Homebrewing beer, gadgets, wine, BBQ blog</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=2.4.6"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
				<item>
			<title>Cinnamon Raisin Bread</title>
			<link>http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/bread/cinnamon-raisin-bread</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:57:07 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Mike Flaminio</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Bread</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">151@http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;It finished baking sooner than the recipe said. I was to bake for 20 then turn and check in 20. I probably could have checked in 15 or even gone 15/15. Internal temp read around 200 +/5 in both loaves, so it was a bit dry. I was also not a fan of all the nuts. Next time I'd reduce the nuts by 1/4 or maybe 1/2. If it was a bit more moist, the nuts might not be as noticeable. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I bumped the Cinnamon up 50%. After baking I buttered the top of the loaf and sprinkled with cinnamon sugar for a nice crust. Next time it might be interesting to put some cinnamon sugar on the inside of the loaf before rolling. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I used more flour than the recipe called for. I would say about 1/2 cup was added. It was pretty sticky coming out of the mixer. I'll have to read the intro part of the book to see if that's typical. Ideally I'd like a consistent dough out of the mixer going just by flour weight. If I can get that, I would save time tinkering with the dough.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I covered the loaves with a towel overnight to cool, then bagged them in ziplock. I put one in the freezer. I plan to foodsaver that to see how it holds up.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;img SRC=http://www.insanely-great.com/img/IMG_0812.jpg WIDTH=500 /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;img SRC=http://www.insanely-great.com/img/IMG_0816.jpg WIDTH=500 /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/bread/cinnamon-raisin-bread&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It finished baking sooner than the recipe said. I was to bake for 20 then turn and check in 20. I probably could have checked in 15 or even gone 15/15. Internal temp read around 200 +/5 in both loaves, so it was a bit dry. I was also not a fan of all the nuts. Next time I'd reduce the nuts by 1/4 or maybe 1/2. If it was a bit more moist, the nuts might not be as noticeable. </p>

<p>I bumped the Cinnamon up 50%. After baking I buttered the top of the loaf and sprinkled with cinnamon sugar for a nice crust. Next time it might be interesting to put some cinnamon sugar on the inside of the loaf before rolling. </p>

<p>I used more flour than the recipe called for. I would say about 1/2 cup was added. It was pretty sticky coming out of the mixer. I'll have to read the intro part of the book to see if that's typical. Ideally I'd like a consistent dough out of the mixer going just by flour weight. If I can get that, I would save time tinkering with the dough.</p>

<p>I covered the loaves with a towel overnight to cool, then bagged them in ziplock. I put one in the freezer. I plan to foodsaver that to see how it holds up.</p>

<p><img SRC=http://www.insanely-great.com/img/IMG_0812.jpg WIDTH=500 /></p>

<p><img SRC=http://www.insanely-great.com/img/IMG_0816.jpg WIDTH=500 /></p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/bread/cinnamon-raisin-bread">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/bread/cinnamon-raisin-bread#comments</comments>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>The Great Bread Experiment</title>
			<link>http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/bread/the-great-bread-experiment</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:35:01 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Mike Flaminio</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Bread</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">150@http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;Brewing is on indefinite hold, but recently I've thought exploring bread. I'm going to try working through the Bread Makers Apprentice. We'll see how long I stick with it, but it should be fun and interesting experience. I want to record my results, so figured I'd use this blog.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Some basics... I'm using SAF Instant yeast. I picked up a bread stone from King Arthur Flour. I use a Thermapen thermo. I plan to mostly mix and kneed in a stand mixer. I'd like to get a new one since mine is pretty small. I like to finish kneading slightly wet dough on the counter. I plan to use mostly Unbleached White KAF Flour.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/bread/the-great-bread-experiment&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brewing is on indefinite hold, but recently I've thought exploring bread. I'm going to try working through the Bread Makers Apprentice. We'll see how long I stick with it, but it should be fun and interesting experience. I want to record my results, so figured I'd use this blog.</p>

<p>Some basics... I'm using SAF Instant yeast. I picked up a bread stone from King Arthur Flour. I use a Thermapen thermo. I plan to mostly mix and kneed in a stand mixer. I'd like to get a new one since mine is pretty small. I like to finish kneading slightly wet dough on the counter. I plan to use mostly Unbleached White KAF Flour.</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/bread/the-great-bread-experiment">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/bread/the-great-bread-experiment#comments</comments>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>How do you fly sparge?</title>
			<link>http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/beer/brewing/how-do-you-fly-sparge</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:17:34 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Mike Flaminio</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Brewing</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">148@http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;Just for the fly spargers out there...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I've tried slowing down my sparge to meet 1 pint/minute. It occurred to me that if I bother figuring this out, I could probably stop watching the kettle for when to end the sparge. This actually seems to work. If I want 7.5 gallons for pre-boil, at 1 pt per minute, I'm done in 60 minutes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My tried and true way was I had a wooden dowel (the other half from the '07 Flanders Red batch) and hashed out per gallons. This works well, except when I use a false bottom. That kind of messing things up, but still, the false bottom is at about the two gallon mark. Also, as the wort heats up, it expands and that can put a little hitch in readings. Probably the biggest though, is there's a degree of babysitting. Every sparge was different. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The way before that, I did total gravity (gravity * volume) to get to my desired gravity, and either kept sparging or added water to get to my pre-boil. This is an excellent system, but for some reason once in a while I'd mess this up. Really though, I lost interest in this when I finally stopped messing with my system and became reasonably predictable on the efficiency. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For a while I was calculating how much water I'd need, minus grain absorption and kettle/system loss. Then I'd just fill my hot liquor tank with that much water. When the HLT went try, I was done. This works well, but every once in a while for some reason I'll need more water. Kind of a pain when I have to choose between using straight tap water or filtering and treating a fresh bunch of water. Plus, I'm not too sure about draining the mash-tun dry. Kind of seems like I might be pulling more undesirable crud from the mash this way.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yet another idea was sort of &quot;pulse sparging&quot; where it's sort of a hybrid between batch and fly sparging. I'd drain the mash-tun down a good ways, then refill with sparge water and keep going until I get what I need. This isn't a measuring technique like the last few. This is handy and seemed to offer up time savings without hurting efficiency. Similar as the pulse sparge though I'm not too thrilled with the idea of draining the MLT.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, how do you fly sparge? My stop watch method seems to work well for me. Basically set it and forget it with really no room for instrument errors.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/beer/brewing/how-do-you-fly-sparge&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the fly spargers out there...</p>

<p>I've tried slowing down my sparge to meet 1 pint/minute. It occurred to me that if I bother figuring this out, I could probably stop watching the kettle for when to end the sparge. This actually seems to work. If I want 7.5 gallons for pre-boil, at 1 pt per minute, I'm done in 60 minutes.</p>

<p>My tried and true way was I had a wooden dowel (the other half from the '07 Flanders Red batch) and hashed out per gallons. This works well, except when I use a false bottom. That kind of messing things up, but still, the false bottom is at about the two gallon mark. Also, as the wort heats up, it expands and that can put a little hitch in readings. Probably the biggest though, is there's a degree of babysitting. Every sparge was different. </p>

<p>The way before that, I did total gravity (gravity * volume) to get to my desired gravity, and either kept sparging or added water to get to my pre-boil. This is an excellent system, but for some reason once in a while I'd mess this up. Really though, I lost interest in this when I finally stopped messing with my system and became reasonably predictable on the efficiency. </p>

<p>For a while I was calculating how much water I'd need, minus grain absorption and kettle/system loss. Then I'd just fill my hot liquor tank with that much water. When the HLT went try, I was done. This works well, but every once in a while for some reason I'll need more water. Kind of a pain when I have to choose between using straight tap water or filtering and treating a fresh bunch of water. Plus, I'm not too sure about draining the mash-tun dry. Kind of seems like I might be pulling more undesirable crud from the mash this way.</p>

<p>Yet another idea was sort of "pulse sparging" where it's sort of a hybrid between batch and fly sparging. I'd drain the mash-tun down a good ways, then refill with sparge water and keep going until I get what I need. This isn't a measuring technique like the last few. This is handy and seemed to offer up time savings without hurting efficiency. Similar as the pulse sparge though I'm not too thrilled with the idea of draining the MLT.</p>

<p>So, how do you fly sparge? My stop watch method seems to work well for me. Basically set it and forget it with really no room for instrument errors.</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/beer/brewing/how-do-you-fly-sparge">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/beer/brewing/how-do-you-fly-sparge#comments</comments>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Cue Rocky Music...</title>
			<link>http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/beer/que-rocky-music</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 01:38:19 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Mike Flaminio</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Beer</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">147@http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;It's been about three months since I put an extract batch into the fermenter. Since August since I fired up the brewery. I think it's time...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While watching some basketball I cleaned up a bunch of stuff. Cleaned up some fermenters, got some gear cleaned up. Even racked a forgotten batch of beer. I was all set to bust up a pile of kegs but couldn't find my socket wrench. Isn't that just the way?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So I'm thinking of running to Harbor Freight tomorrow and buy a new wrench. The brew store is on that side of town... I might get some yeast for Sunday.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/beer/que-rocky-music&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's been about three months since I put an extract batch into the fermenter. Since August since I fired up the brewery. I think it's time...</p>

<p>While watching some basketball I cleaned up a bunch of stuff. Cleaned up some fermenters, got some gear cleaned up. Even racked a forgotten batch of beer. I was all set to bust up a pile of kegs but couldn't find my socket wrench. Isn't that just the way?</p>

<p>So I'm thinking of running to Harbor Freight tomorrow and buy a new wrench. The brew store is on that side of town... I might get some yeast for Sunday.</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/beer/que-rocky-music">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/beer/que-rocky-music#comments</comments>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Cherry Beer Update</title>
			<link>http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/beer/batches/cherry-beer-update</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:33:00 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Mike Flaminio</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Batches</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">145@http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;Wow... long time no post around here. Been busy with the first born.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Two thoughts on these cherry beers. First, not nearly enough cherry! It has a faint aroma and some background flavor. People generally not familiar with cherry beers seem to say they can't pick up any cherry. I would maybe double if not triple the cherries next time. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The second issue, is I pick up a little metallic flavor. I think it's stronger in the American wheat. At first I thought something might have gone weird with that one, but I later I could pick it up in the Belgian too. First guess might be the cherry cans. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The beer did turn out a little tart from the cherries, and also has a sort of pink lemon aid look to it. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, next time I might go for frozen cherries, or at least canned cherries from someone else.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/beer/batches/cherry-beer-update&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow... long time no post around here. Been busy with the first born.</p>

<p>Two thoughts on these cherry beers. First, not nearly enough cherry! It has a faint aroma and some background flavor. People generally not familiar with cherry beers seem to say they can't pick up any cherry. I would maybe double if not triple the cherries next time. </p>

<p>The second issue, is I pick up a little metallic flavor. I think it's stronger in the American wheat. At first I thought something might have gone weird with that one, but I later I could pick it up in the Belgian too. First guess might be the cherry cans. </p>

<p>The beer did turn out a little tart from the cherries, and also has a sort of pink lemon aid look to it. </p>

<p>So, next time I might go for frozen cherries, or at least canned cherries from someone else.</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/beer/batches/cherry-beer-update">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/beer/batches/cherry-beer-update#comments</comments>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Belgian and American Cherry Wheat</title>
			<link>http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/beer/batches/cherry_wheat</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:39:35 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Mike Flaminio</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Batches</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">144@http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;Recently I discovered New Glarus Belgian Red and it's good stuff. Also, I recently judged fruit beers and all that got my wheels turning. I never use real fruit before, just the flavor extracts. I made up a double batch wheat beer, and split it with WLP320 and WLP550. The other part of this is I've got a sack of German Wheat I'm working through, so I wanted it make a light wheat beer.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I went looking for some fruit, and I was going to go with the Oregon Puree stuff, but wanted to use tart cherries. They only sell sweet cherries. New Glarus uses Wisconsin Montmorency cherries, and I found some canned Michigan Montmorency cherries. They're canned in water, pitted and stemmed. So, they're pretty convenient and closest I'll probably care to get to fresh whole fruit. I ordered a case (about 12 lbs) and put 6# in each batch. Without the pits and stems, I figure it should be close to 7.5 lbs of whole fruit.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anyway, the canned fruit is cool since it's already sterile. I fermented each batch individually, then racked to a secondary w/ the fruit. Basically my recipe is 50/50 Maris Otter and Wheat, with 1 LB C40 and 12 IBUs. We'll see how it turns out. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class=&quot;image_block&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/media/blogs/beer/IMG_0922.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;500&quot; /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;image_block&quot;&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/media/blogs/beer/IMG_0919.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;500&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/beer/batches/cherry_wheat&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I discovered New Glarus Belgian Red and it's good stuff. Also, I recently judged fruit beers and all that got my wheels turning. I never use real fruit before, just the flavor extracts. I made up a double batch wheat beer, and split it with WLP320 and WLP550. The other part of this is I've got a sack of German Wheat I'm working through, so I wanted it make a light wheat beer.</p>

<p>I went looking for some fruit, and I was going to go with the Oregon Puree stuff, but wanted to use tart cherries. They only sell sweet cherries. New Glarus uses Wisconsin Montmorency cherries, and I found some canned Michigan Montmorency cherries. They're canned in water, pitted and stemmed. So, they're pretty convenient and closest I'll probably care to get to fresh whole fruit. I ordered a case (about 12 lbs) and put 6# in each batch. Without the pits and stems, I figure it should be close to 7.5 lbs of whole fruit.</p>

<p>Anyway, the canned fruit is cool since it's already sterile. I fermented each batch individually, then racked to a secondary w/ the fruit. Basically my recipe is 50/50 Maris Otter and Wheat, with 1 LB C40 and 12 IBUs. We'll see how it turns out. </p>

<div class="image_block"><img src="http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/media/blogs/beer/IMG_0922.jpg" alt="" title="" width="500" /></div><div class="image_block">

<p><img src="http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/media/blogs/beer/IMG_0919.jpg" alt="" title="" width="500" /></p></div><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/beer/batches/cherry_wheat">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/beer/batches/cherry_wheat#comments</comments>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Bad Score Sheets</title>
			<link>http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/beer/bad-score-sheets</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:29:17 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Mike Flaminio</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Beer</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">143@http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;I got this one in from our State Fair. Most my other sheets are pretty good, but this one was freaken ridiculous. The second judge on this beer was pretty bad too, but this one takes the cake.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://flaminio.net/img/badsheet.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/beer/bad-score-sheets&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got this one in from our State Fair. Most my other sheets are pretty good, but this one was freaken ridiculous. The second judge on this beer was pretty bad too, but this one takes the cake.</p>

<p><img src="http://flaminio.net/img/badsheet.jpg" alt="" title="" /></p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/beer/bad-score-sheets">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/beer/bad-score-sheets#comments</comments>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Digital TV: Dumping cable for the antenna</title>
			<link>http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/other/digital-tv-canceling-cable</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:22:18 +0000</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Mike Flaminio</dc:creator>
			<category domain="main">Other</category>			<guid isPermaLink="false">142@http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/</guid>
						<description>&lt;p&gt;A little departure here, but something that others may find interesting.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With the arrival of baby Ben, we're looking to economize. Cable TV is the top of the list. I've read a lot on digital TV, and what's particularly cool about it is if it you have a halfway decent signal, you'll have a perfect picture. There's no ghosting, no fuzzy, no funky colors, no buzzing sound. So, it seemed I could get a great TV, but just fewer channels. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We watch some misc cable channels, but the bulk of what we watch in on the Tivo and from the broadcast networks. Everything else is on DVD or can be gotten on DVD from Netflix or the library. So, it seems we can cut the cable to save a good deal of cash with only a minor lifestyle change. The other question was whether to just keep the minimal basic for about $20/mo w/ taxes and fees, or deal with an antenna. I did some research and it seemed I should have no problem getting a decent signal at the house. And with a little upfront outlay, I should be able to have free TV and recover my costs within a year even over the costs of minimal cable.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The other part of the plan was we would keep Tivo. We're big fans, and we figure the Tivo will maximize the channels we get for our entertainment. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here are a couple sites I used to gear up my migration to the antenna:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.antennaweb.org/&quot;&gt;http://www.antennaweb.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tvfool.com/&quot;&gt;http://www.tvfool.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;These two sites are great for helping decide what kind of antenna to get, and how to point that antenna, and even what you may get over the air. A key point for me is I didn't want to have to rotate the antenna to use it. I just wanted a good fixed antenna. I was fortunate that I'm there's a cluster of antennas close to the same direction from my house (NBC, FOX, CN, ABC), and the other antennas (CBS, PBS) are close enough to me that I don't need to be pointing at them. Plus, there are some other misc channels with general syndicated programming, So, it looked like I could get away with a fixed directional antenna.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Gear&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, here's a breakdown of what I built. I got a lot of this from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.warrenelectronics.com&quot;&gt;Warren Electronics&lt;/a&gt;, which seem to have good prices and great people. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Channel Master 4228 Antenna - $50&lt;br /&gt;
Heavy Duty Pole (4x - 20ft) - $30&lt;br /&gt;
Heavy Duty Wall mounts (4x) - $14&lt;br /&gt;
4' Grounding Rod - $5&lt;br /&gt;
6 Gauge Copper wire - $25&lt;br /&gt;
50' RG-6 Quad Shield Cable - $30&lt;br /&gt;
Grounding Block - $1&lt;br /&gt;
Channel Master 7777 Pre-Amp - $53&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, in total I was out $208 + shipping. The pre-amp wasn't really needed, but I've got about 100 feet of coax between the antenna and my living room set, so I figured I would do it right, and I'm glad I did. (see below). So Based on my current cable bill, I'd make that back in about four months, and in about 11 months with just basic cable. Sounds good.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I got my $40 coupon things from the Gov and I picked up a cheap-o converter from Walmart for a net $9.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Installation&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There are a couple things I considered with the installation. I was originally going to put it up on the chimney, but I started thinking about a few things there. While it was an easy install, I didn't like the idea of putting more stress on the brick chimney with the wind blowing on the antenna. Also, that would be more cabling and I preferred to keep it as short as possible, and finally I was a little paranoid of lighting and I wouldn't be able to give a direct route to ground. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, I went with a basic pole setup. I attached it to  a shed attachd onto the garage, and that let me get inside the shed to build in some supports. I screwed in 2x4 braces into the framing and then I screwed the mounts into that. I used a total of 20 feet of pole. 10 feet is attached to the shed, and 10 feet in the air. this gets most of the antenna peaking over the roof line. I was going to go 25 feet, but felt a little iffy going that high without some kind of guy wire support. As it turns out, there's no need to go higher, so I left it at 20. I was going to make a cement base for it, but got lazy. Instead, I just used four mounts and that should be more than sturdy. Also, the mast poles from Warren are pretty heavy duty. Compared to what I found at Lowes and Menards, these are way better. I wouldn't be all that confident in the lighter poles holding during a good storm.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The cable run is pretty simple. I ran 25 feet of RG-6 quad shielded coax down the pole, tacked it onto the house, through the grounding block, and drilled a whole into the house. From there, I just ran it over to my existing cable splitter. Originally I was going to make my own cable. I've got the tools and cabling and figured I could save $30 or so. Even if you're good at it, I don't recommend it. I suggest buying a quality commercial cables because there would be nothing worse than something coming loose in a January blizzard. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The other big factor was the grounding. It's important to ground both the antenna and mast. It took a little effort figure out where the house ground was. My cable and phone hookups are just tied into the metal pole housing the electrical. Going down stairs with a flash light, I found a big copper wire running from the electric box along the top of the basement wall to the old well pipe. As it turns out, this is exactly where I would be placing my antenna, so that worked out perfectly. It's important to tie the antenna into the house ground, otherwise you will  creating a ground loop. You want all electrical energy to be flowing in the same direction, if just to eliminate interference, or worse, keep an electrical spike from running through your equipment rather than the electrical ground. I also used a grounding spike for the mast. I ran a 6 gauge wire down the mast and into the grounding spike, and then tied the spike into the house ground. The idea here is first the mast ground should discharge any electrical energy, which should minimize the changes of a lightening strike, but in the event that happens, I'm providing a direct path straight down. For the grounding block, I just drilled a hole into the basement next to the hole for the antenna coax. I ran the copper wire around the house ground wire and then tied it into the block. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As it turned out, I've got about 100 feet of between the antenna and my main TV. I've got a powered amp I used with cable TV, and the signal was decent. Most my channels were coming in at 60-75%, with my lower power PBS down in 50%. CBS and PBS was behind me, but only about 8 miles away. I would get occasional broken signal, but with some antenna tweaking I had it pretty good for all channels. I tried using just a good splitter, and the signal went way down. Most channels were down to 40% and the PBS was marginal and the CBS broke up frequently. It seemed I need an amp of some kind to get my signal to the living room, so I decided to spring for a pre-amp and do it right.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Basically, by running an amp in-line I was boosting the signal, but also boosting any noise I picked up along the way. Boosting the signal at the antenna will always give a superior signal. I figured since I was in this deep already, might as well go another $50. This increased my signal well and got most my channels into the low 80's and PBS up to 60%. Everything came in well, and I was satisfied. The pre-amp seems highly rated with good power and minimal noise. It's kind of nifty since you put the amp up on the antenna, plug the antenna into the amp, then run the coax down into the house. At the TV, yo plug the coax into the power adapter, then from the adapter into the TV/converter. This send power the amp so you don't need to run a dedicated power up the mast.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tivo HD&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The final piece of the puzzle I decided to upgrade the Tivo. The thought process here was I wanted to get a higher end converter anyway since the cheap one was just for testing. I wanted something with component out, and since digital TV had 5.1 surround sound, that would be cool to plug into my stereo. These specs are pretty high end boxes, and I figured one would run me $110-$120 even with the $40 coupon. Contrast this with a refurbished Tivo HD, at $180, basically I'd kick in an extra $60. And I could probably sell my old Tivo on Craigslist. In exchange, I'll get higher quality Tivo viewing since the Tivo records in HD and converts down to SD, I'd get 5.1 sound both live and recorded, and I'd get dual tuners. And also, whenever we get around to getting a HD set, our Tivo will be ready. So, it seemed like a good move. Not surprisingly, the Tivo seems to have a better tuner than the Wallyworld special. This boosted up my signal into the mid 90's, and PBS up into the upper 70%. Bonus.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, now I'm getting very strong signals that's actually much better than cable. The down converted HD looks fantastic, and my digital cable would occasionally scramble out on me, so the antenna is actually proving to be more reliable. Plus, I'm getting 5.1 sound. All in all, this is a good upgrade, plus a money saver.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;item_footer&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/other/digital-tv-canceling-cable&quot;&gt;Original post&lt;/a&gt; blogged on &lt;a href=&quot;http://b2evolution.net/&quot;&gt;b2evolution&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little departure here, but something that others may find interesting.</p>

<p>With the arrival of baby Ben, we're looking to economize. Cable TV is the top of the list. I've read a lot on digital TV, and what's particularly cool about it is if it you have a halfway decent signal, you'll have a perfect picture. There's no ghosting, no fuzzy, no funky colors, no buzzing sound. So, it seemed I could get a great TV, but just fewer channels. </p>

<p>We watch some misc cable channels, but the bulk of what we watch in on the Tivo and from the broadcast networks. Everything else is on DVD or can be gotten on DVD from Netflix or the library. So, it seems we can cut the cable to save a good deal of cash with only a minor lifestyle change. The other question was whether to just keep the minimal basic for about $20/mo w/ taxes and fees, or deal with an antenna. I did some research and it seemed I should have no problem getting a decent signal at the house. And with a little upfront outlay, I should be able to have free TV and recover my costs within a year even over the costs of minimal cable.</p>

<p>The other part of the plan was we would keep Tivo. We're big fans, and we figure the Tivo will maximize the channels we get for our entertainment. </p>

<p>Here are a couple sites I used to gear up my migration to the antenna:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.antennaweb.org/">http://www.antennaweb.org/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.tvfool.com/">http://www.tvfool.com/</a></p>

<p>These two sites are great for helping decide what kind of antenna to get, and how to point that antenna, and even what you may get over the air. A key point for me is I didn't want to have to rotate the antenna to use it. I just wanted a good fixed antenna. I was fortunate that I'm there's a cluster of antennas close to the same direction from my house (NBC, FOX, CN, ABC), and the other antennas (CBS, PBS) are close enough to me that I don't need to be pointing at them. Plus, there are some other misc channels with general syndicated programming, So, it looked like I could get away with a fixed directional antenna.</p>

<p><strong>Gear</strong></p>

<p>So, here's a breakdown of what I built. I got a lot of this from <a href="http://www.warrenelectronics.com">Warren Electronics</a>, which seem to have good prices and great people. </p>

<p>Channel Master 4228 Antenna - $50<br />
Heavy Duty Pole (4x - 20ft) - $30<br />
Heavy Duty Wall mounts (4x) - $14<br />
4' Grounding Rod - $5<br />
6 Gauge Copper wire - $25<br />
50' RG-6 Quad Shield Cable - $30<br />
Grounding Block - $1<br />
Channel Master 7777 Pre-Amp - $53</p>

<p>So, in total I was out $208 + shipping. The pre-amp wasn't really needed, but I've got about 100 feet of coax between the antenna and my living room set, so I figured I would do it right, and I'm glad I did. (see below). So Based on my current cable bill, I'd make that back in about four months, and in about 11 months with just basic cable. Sounds good.</p>

<p>I got my $40 coupon things from the Gov and I picked up a cheap-o converter from Walmart for a net $9.</p>

<p><strong>Installation</strong></p>

<p>There are a couple things I considered with the installation. I was originally going to put it up on the chimney, but I started thinking about a few things there. While it was an easy install, I didn't like the idea of putting more stress on the brick chimney with the wind blowing on the antenna. Also, that would be more cabling and I preferred to keep it as short as possible, and finally I was a little paranoid of lighting and I wouldn't be able to give a direct route to ground. </p>

<p>So, I went with a basic pole setup. I attached it to  a shed attachd onto the garage, and that let me get inside the shed to build in some supports. I screwed in 2x4 braces into the framing and then I screwed the mounts into that. I used a total of 20 feet of pole. 10 feet is attached to the shed, and 10 feet in the air. this gets most of the antenna peaking over the roof line. I was going to go 25 feet, but felt a little iffy going that high without some kind of guy wire support. As it turns out, there's no need to go higher, so I left it at 20. I was going to make a cement base for it, but got lazy. Instead, I just used four mounts and that should be more than sturdy. Also, the mast poles from Warren are pretty heavy duty. Compared to what I found at Lowes and Menards, these are way better. I wouldn't be all that confident in the lighter poles holding during a good storm.</p>

<p>The cable run is pretty simple. I ran 25 feet of RG-6 quad shielded coax down the pole, tacked it onto the house, through the grounding block, and drilled a whole into the house. From there, I just ran it over to my existing cable splitter. Originally I was going to make my own cable. I've got the tools and cabling and figured I could save $30 or so. Even if you're good at it, I don't recommend it. I suggest buying a quality commercial cables because there would be nothing worse than something coming loose in a January blizzard. </p>

<p>The other big factor was the grounding. It's important to ground both the antenna and mast. It took a little effort figure out where the house ground was. My cable and phone hookups are just tied into the metal pole housing the electrical. Going down stairs with a flash light, I found a big copper wire running from the electric box along the top of the basement wall to the old well pipe. As it turns out, this is exactly where I would be placing my antenna, so that worked out perfectly. It's important to tie the antenna into the house ground, otherwise you will  creating a ground loop. You want all electrical energy to be flowing in the same direction, if just to eliminate interference, or worse, keep an electrical spike from running through your equipment rather than the electrical ground. I also used a grounding spike for the mast. I ran a 6 gauge wire down the mast and into the grounding spike, and then tied the spike into the house ground. The idea here is first the mast ground should discharge any electrical energy, which should minimize the changes of a lightening strike, but in the event that happens, I'm providing a direct path straight down. For the grounding block, I just drilled a hole into the basement next to the hole for the antenna coax. I ran the copper wire around the house ground wire and then tied it into the block. </p>

<p>As it turned out, I've got about 100 feet of between the antenna and my main TV. I've got a powered amp I used with cable TV, and the signal was decent. Most my channels were coming in at 60-75%, with my lower power PBS down in 50%. CBS and PBS was behind me, but only about 8 miles away. I would get occasional broken signal, but with some antenna tweaking I had it pretty good for all channels. I tried using just a good splitter, and the signal went way down. Most channels were down to 40% and the PBS was marginal and the CBS broke up frequently. It seemed I need an amp of some kind to get my signal to the living room, so I decided to spring for a pre-amp and do it right.</p>

<p>Basically, by running an amp in-line I was boosting the signal, but also boosting any noise I picked up along the way. Boosting the signal at the antenna will always give a superior signal. I figured since I was in this deep already, might as well go another $50. This increased my signal well and got most my channels into the low 80's and PBS up to 60%. Everything came in well, and I was satisfied. The pre-amp seems highly rated with good power and minimal noise. It's kind of nifty since you put the amp up on the antenna, plug the antenna into the amp, then run the coax down into the house. At the TV, yo plug the coax into the power adapter, then from the adapter into the TV/converter. This send power the amp so you don't need to run a dedicated power up the mast.</p>

<p><strong>Tivo HD</strong></p>

<p>The final piece of the puzzle I decided to upgrade the Tivo. The thought process here was I wanted to get a higher end converter anyway since the cheap one was just for testing. I wanted something with component out, and since digital TV had 5.1 surround sound, that would be cool to plug into my stereo. These specs are pretty high end boxes, and I figured one would run me $110-$120 even with the $40 coupon. Contrast this with a refurbished Tivo HD, at $180, basically I'd kick in an extra $60. And I could probably sell my old Tivo on Craigslist. In exchange, I'll get higher quality Tivo viewing since the Tivo records in HD and converts down to SD, I'd get 5.1 sound both live and recorded, and I'd get dual tuners. And also, whenever we get around to getting a HD set, our Tivo will be ready. So, it seemed like a good move. Not surprisingly, the Tivo seems to have a better tuner than the Wallyworld special. This boosted up my signal into the mid 90's, and PBS up into the upper 70%. Bonus.</p>

<p>So, now I'm getting very strong signals that's actually much better than cable. The down converted HD looks fantastic, and my digital cable would occasionally scramble out on me, so the antenna is actually proving to be more reliable. Plus, I'm getting 5.1 sound. All in all, this is a good upgrade, plus a money saver.</p><div class="item_footer"><p><small><a href="http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/other/digital-tv-canceling-cable">Original post</a> blogged on <a href="http://b2evolution.net/">b2evolution</a>.</small></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
								<comments>http://blog.flaminio.net/blogs/index.php/other/digital-tv-canceling-cable#comments</comments>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>

