An observation today... The test batch that was saturated with O2 (left) has significantly more yeast than the controlled O2 batch. All that yeast growth is great for making yeast, but I don't think it's so great for making beer...
| « Founder's Red's Rye - Tasting & Recipe | The O2 Experiments » |
Trackback address for this post
Trackback URL (right click and copy shortcut/link location)
5 comments
This post has 1791 feedbacks awaiting moderation...
I think there needs to be a differentiation between pitch rate (growth in the starter) and growth in the fermenter. In the previous Dissolved O2 post I cited a couple sources indicating that excessive yeast growth in the fermenter isn't desirable (Lewis/Young, Brewing), (Fix, Analysis of Brewing Techniques).
Generally, we want no more than 3-4 cell divisions for fermentation (M.B. Raines). If there is O2 present, the yeast will continue to propagate. So, if we're pitching an approximate ideal rate for that 3-4 fold growth, it would seem we want to match the O2 requirements to not only support that growth, but also not to exceed it.
I was thinking of doing another test with three jugs. One with no O2, one with 10 ppm, and one saturated, then compare. That may illustrate the difference in growth between oxygen levels.
I invite everyone to do some split batch experiments and see if any of this manifests in the glass.
Usually what I do, is I'll rack to a keg, chill the keg down to close to freezing, then do a gelatin treatment. Isinglass work even better, but I just use gel since it's cheap and I buy it at the store. Then I leave it a few days, and rack to a serving keg. All the yeast has settled out. Good luck!